android
  #1  
Old 02-01-2007, 11:38 AM
thomasowen thomasowen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 21
Default Vision M Vs Vision W

I'm really stuck about which player I should get. At first I was going to get a M but then I started looking at the W and that looks like it has advantages over the M. I've just saved up the 150 for a M and I don't know if the extra 60 will be worth it. Could someone please try and help. is the W worth the extra!?!?!
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

  #2  
Old 02-01-2007, 03:09 PM
HipHopScribe's Avatar
HipHopScribe HipHopScribe is offline
Ultra Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,000
Default

It's worth it if you watch a lot of movies, especially widescreen.
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 02-01-2007, 03:58 PM
mathomas mathomas is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12
Default

ZV:M - smaller, more accessories generally available

ZV:W - better for watching movies, comes w/ ~$30 charger and ~$20 A/V cable, Compact Flash card great for dumping off digital camera

I have ZV:W for travelling / serious video watching, and a smaller MP3 player (Rio Carbon -- can't talk my wife into trading her Zen V) for jogging and purely listening.

IMO, ZV:M screen is too small for watching video. If I am going to be watching video, I tolerate the larger size (e.g. throw in backpack instead of pocket) to get the advantage of the bigger screen...

The cost of the included accessories helps to offset the extra price...
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.