android
  #1  
Old 09-10-2008, 11:56 AM
yuki's Avatar
yuki yuki is offline
General Audio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 519
Default 2XL Spoke IEMs, $13 well spent review

in-ear buds (spoke)
cable length - 1.2M
driver diameter - 10mm
plug type - 3.5 mm chrome plated
max. input power - 30 mW
impedance - 32ohms
frequency range - 20-20,000 Hz
magnet type Ė NdFeB (just saying that it is neodymium magnet based)



I was in my local best buy the other day making snide comments about skull candy headphones, probably the worst value in pos headphones on the market next to the apple ipod ear budsÖ Well then I happen to glance over and see a new low end brand on the market, 2XL for a whopping $13 for a pair of IEMS with 3 sizes of silicon tips. Needless to say I used my store credit I had left over after a price match to get 2 different pair, the first being the in ear model called the spoke. The packaging is not bad at all, minimalist and easy to open even though it is a blister pack, they can be opened without scissors.

The build quality of the spoke are nothing special, better than other low end Phillips models I have seen but not great at all, typical Chinese OEM quality. The microphonics are bad, it seems the material that the cable is using is a silicon type plastic and transfers sound from bumps and movement quit well. In all though for $13 you can not expect much, they silicon tips are comfortable and soft though.

I tested the 2XL spoke using an m-audio micro and winamp set at flat eq.

Sound quality was surprising however for the price, the sound quality isnít the worst I have heard, it is better than the Sony fontopia IEMís. Bass response at about 100Hz and below is fair; it has a bloated low end though. After about 3 hours or so the drivers do produce more bass than when new out of the box. Bass accuracy is hit or miss, less complex bass such as with little harmonics like with a synth drum seem to fair ok, but instruments with complex harmonics on the bass end seem to cause a fair bit of driver distortion. I used Chicane Ė Low Sun to test synthetic bass (from a drum machine) and the bass was tight and clear, trebles were not detailed, but at the same time not overly veiled either. I really cant compared the lack of detail to any other headphone because the lack of detail is very unique to the 2XL. The Mids to seem hollow though in all cases tested present but hollow. Any high above about 14 Khz seems aliased, almost compressed sounding. Using BWV 1010, a bach cello piece, with very complex harmonics and lows reaching about 60 Hz you can hear how bass quality on a good pair of headphones, the 2XL fail miserably at listenable volumes, the bass seems distorted and very resonant, a plastic kind of resonance on the low notes, mids on this track donít seem to bad but not good.

Some music is ok while other not so good on these IEMís, which still sound better than most low end IEM offerings. Electronic music sounds ok for the most part, vocals are a lacking detail as are harmonics on cello and piano pieces. Surprising enough other than a bit of veiling though BWV 1056 for harpsichord and violin sounds decent. c

For the low price of $13, you really can not beat the value these IEMís have to offer, they beat every pack in I have heard thus far from any dap, including the Sony A815 and the new zune.
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

  #2  
Old 09-10-2008, 12:39 PM
FrododorF's Avatar
FrododorF FrododorF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Montgomery AL
Posts: 712
Default

how would you compare them to some more well known phones, cans or whatever?
__________________
Leprechauns hide their gold in Electrical Outlets..
..Use Forks to Get em Out..
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 09-10-2008, 05:49 PM
yuki's Avatar
yuki yuki is offline
General Audio Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mesa Az
Posts: 519
Default

possibly below the air cushions quality, but not by much, sound wise... The build quality on the air cushions is much better
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 09-10-2008, 05:57 PM
WalkGood's Avatar
WalkGood WalkGood is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 12,579
Default

yuki, nice review
__________________
WalkGood,
Ramůn

abi >> | Forum Rules | Glossary | Why Rockbox | FLAC or MP3? | irc
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 10-05-2008, 11:22 AM
dfkt's Avatar
dfkt dfkt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 15,330
Default

FYI, Hulk posted some more impressions about the 2XL: http://anythingbutipod.com/forum/sho...&postcount=275
__________________
Please don't PM me with questions that can be answered in a forum thread. Don't be an idiot.
My Gear and Reviews | My RMAA Tests | IRC: #anythingbutipod on Freenode | Last.fm | Album Art Exchange | Rockbox | Replaygain
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 10-06-2008, 02:45 AM
yruluis's Avatar
yruluis yruluis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 31
Default

Ha! Those are the exact same ones that I'm currently using. Are they actually called spoke? Best Buy (where I got them) has them listed as wreckingball. Well, I'm going to have to get a new pair because my mom lost the medium sized rubbers that were right for me and now my hamster bit through one of the cables.

I got them mostly to replace my skullcandy that were damaged. I never got the chance to buy another pair of skullcandy because I couldn't find them. I was going to get the black ones (I hated the white, red and green one) but those weren't the ones on sale ( some Best Buy bull), so I got these which I hated at first because of the color but they just grew on me.

I recommend these earphones. I don't buy high-end earphones considering how many earphones I go through.
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 03-16-2009, 03:53 PM
Doggonit Doggonit is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 71
Default

Pardon me, but how are these IEM's? These are certainly not in-ear monitors. They are in-ear/in-canal headphones, but monitor's they are not. I do not like to see that term get thrown about as readily as it is.
__________________
Sony NWZ-S639F in Black <- Screen broke, Sony repairs are prohibitively expensive
Samsung Q1 (16GB) w. Ultimate Ears super.fi 5's & FiiO E5
Backup: iRiver S10
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 03-16-2009, 03:57 PM
dfkt's Avatar
dfkt dfkt is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 15,330
Default

It's all the same... there's no clear definition. Of course "monitor" sounds fancier, but the anatomical and technical background is the same. My UE11 aren't "monitors" either - I would never use them for mixing/mastering audio tracks.
__________________
Please don't PM me with questions that can be answered in a forum thread. Don't be an idiot.
My Gear and Reviews | My RMAA Tests | IRC: #anythingbutipod on Freenode | Last.fm | Album Art Exchange | Rockbox | Replaygain
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 03-16-2009, 04:12 PM
Doggonit Doggonit is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 71
Default

That surprises me because that is apparently just what their purpose is, to be an in-ear monitor. Do they not produce flat phase and frequency responses? I must assume their sound stage is impressive, to say the least. I would be shocked to hear otherwise.

So I guess you use a studio monitor loudspeaker then?
__________________
Sony NWZ-S639F in Black <- Screen broke, Sony repairs are prohibitively expensive
Samsung Q1 (16GB) w. Ultimate Ears super.fi 5's & FiiO E5
Backup: iRiver S10
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 03-17-2009, 10:10 AM
tenzip's Avatar
tenzip tenzip is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
Posts: 74
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yruluis View Post
Well, I'm going to have to get a new pair because my mom lost the medium sized rubbers that were right for me and now my hamster bit through one of the cables.
I read this, and nearly sprayed Mt. Dew on my monitor. Just struck me really funny.

Oedipal much?
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.