android
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 05-06-2012, 08:04 PM
saratoga saratoga is offline
Rockbox Developer / Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,732
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bikertrash View Post
It probably wouldn't take much to beat the price on any device they have.
Oh yeah? Who else sells a 160GB player a lot cheaper then an ipod classic?

You only think it wouldn't take much because you don't know what it would take: massive volume. You need to sell tens of millions of units to get into Apple's costs. And basically no one but Sandisk or Sansung can do that, and those can only do it for certain models (e.g. stripped down Galaxy phones).

Everyone else either cuts corners, sells something Apple doesn't sell, or costs more. Sandisk being the obvious example. They need 5x the battery capacity as Apple players to match the same battery life. They still haven't gotten their AAC decoder to work on files over 15 minutes. They have occasional quality issues (i.e. flash memory hiss). They could fix these things by using modern processors, better materials and more engineers, but then you wouldn't be able to get one of their players for much cheaper then a Nano.

Then there is the Fuze+

Anyway, this isn't to say Apple is the best at everything. But for a given design, they will almost certainly sell it for much less then anyone but maybe Samsung could even break even for.
__________________
Interested in Google's Summer of Code ? PM me.
Reply With Quote

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.