android
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30  
Old 03-22-2012, 10:57 AM
skip252 skip252 is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,824
Default

No conspiracy in my book. Just sloppy journalism. In the top 5 article dated Feb. 14 2012 they use the same review from May 2009 for the Klipsch S4. Their bottom line
Quote:
The Klipsch Image S4 earphones offer up sound quality on par with and better than sets that cost many times as much; they are a spectacular choice for anyone looking for new earbuds.
Really? How can an review from years ago speak to today's value?

Conceding what you say, and as a former owner I don't, why not update to reflect today's market rather than over 2 years ago. They're advising you how today's dollars based on yesterday's information. You say there's been changes in the value of the S4, why doesn't their article reflect that?

Take a look at their top 5 headphones article. The Portapro Review is from 2008, the bose review is from 2006. You seriously want me to believe that there's been NO changes in the headphone market in 4-6 years?

Basing an article for today's buyer based on old information just doesn't do today's buyer any justice. At least add a prominent note that any price references were from the time of the original article and that it's possible that the bang for the buck quotient may have changed.
Reply With Quote

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.