android
Go Back   abi>>forums > General Audio > Headphones > Headphone User Reviews

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-23-2011, 05:36 PM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default MEElectronics Original M Series Review and Comparison (M2, M9, M6 & M11+)

Introduction

With MEElectronics' new M Series out the older M6 has got a new MSRP of $29.99 placing it in direct competition with the budget oriented M9 (MSRP: $19.99). And with street prices narrowing the gap to only a few bucks, the question of M9 or M6 has become a popular on the forums. I have written many replies to this question to help buyers make a choice and finally decided it was time to write a comparison and review rather than just answer the question over and over again. And while I am at it, I might as well included the M2 (MSRP: $11.99) and M11+ (MSRP: $44.99) and make it the whole original M Series.

M2

The M2 is the cheapest of all the M Series models and it's accessories reflect that. It comes in a tube rather than the normal MEElectonics box and includes your standard small, medium, and large single flanges and recently MEElectonics has also started including a pair of double-flanges--another sign that MEElectronics listens to their customers. That is all for for the accessories though.

Build quality is good for an IEM in the M2's price range. Housing are made of metal, something not commonly found amongst similarly priced IEM's. Their weakness lies in the glue holding the housing to the nozzle. I had my first pair of M2 break here while trying to change the tips. MEElectronics promptly replaced them though and the second pair is still going strong--a nod to MEElectonics customer service. The M2 uses the same cable as all M Series earphones making it easily the best cable I have seen on an IEM at this price. My only complaint about the cable is that it has bad memory. I suspect this is due to the cable tie it came wrapped in was too tight and left kinks in the cable. The cable is a little shorter than the other M Series cables at 4 feet--still plenty long enough for me despite being rather tall at 6'3. Cable reliefs are nothing more than clear PVC, but they seem to do their job as I have had no problems yet. On the other end of the cable my M2P (mic'd version) terminates in a 45 degree plug, I believe the M2 may have 90 degree plug though.

Comfort is a little awkward due to the cone shape design. The large nozzle causes minor discomfort for my small ears. However, using a tip that inserts deeper in the ear like Sony Hybrids or the double-flange helps greatly (and improves the seal). Otherwise, the M2 is very light and very comfortable.

I am a poor judge of isolation since I mostly listen in quiet environments, but the M2 is probably not the best at blocking out noise due to the large vent.

Sound-wise, the M2 is very impressive for such a cheap IEM. No, it is not even going challenge IEM's three times its price, but it will out do other IEM's like the JVC Marshmallows and Skullcandy Ink'd. Bass is dominate, but all in all the M2 is one of the most balanced budget IEM's I have heard. The bass is punchy and far better controlled and less muddy than the Marshmallows. Unlike the other M Series IEM's, the M2 is not V shaped and the mids are not recessed. The highs are not quite as prominent as the highs of the other M Series models, but they are still very much there and have a nice sparkle. Sound stage is about what you would expect from IEM this price, nothing special, but nothing terrible either. Clarity may be the biggest strength of the M2 boasting more than I would have though possible from IEM of it's price.

Really, the M2 is a great deal. The only problem is that the M9 can be had for only a few dollars more when on sale. Because of that I have a hard time recommending the M2. Probably only reason I would get the M2 over the M9 is the mids of the M9 are just too recessed for some music whereas the mids of the M2 are fine. That or when you just need a disposable headset for your phone.

M9

The M9 is big step up from the M2 in accessories--another reason it is probably worth forking out the extra dollar or two. The M9 comes in the normal MEElectonics packaging and includes a case, cable wrap, and airplane adapter, small, medium, and large single flanges, and double-flange. (Older M9 came with a gray "balanced" double-flange, but I am not sure if the current ones do or not.)

Build quality is great for a budget IEM. The housings are made of metal just like the M2, but seem sturdier as the the housing is one piece not two. The cable is the same as the M2 but longer at 4.6 feet. Strain reliefs are present and do their job. The plug is the same as the 45 degree one used on the M2P.

Comfort is good for the most part. The only time I notice any discomfort is when wearing the M9 inserted deeply the housing puts a little pressure on the outer ear canal. Of course, this is solved by wearing the M9 with different set of tips. The only complaint then is that the M9 may be a little big for small ears.

Isolation, again, I am a poor judge of this, but the M9 is vented like the M2 so isolation is not the best. The fact that the M9 can be worn deeper in the ear though does improve isolation.

Sound quality is a step up from the M2 which is why I recommend spending the extra to get the M9. A note on the sound of the M9 though: it changes dramatically depending on the tips you use. I generally use small Sony Hybrids and a deep insertion, so keep that in mind when reading my comments on the sound. Bass is has decent extension, probably the best of all the models in this review. The bass is very hard hitting and be brain jarring when worn with deep insertion--yes, that is why I do it . The biggest problem with the bass is it creeps up and over powers the mids. Speaking of he mids, they are recessed, the most recess of all the original M Series. Depending on the music, it is a enough to drive to crazy. Apart from being recessed though the mids are actually quite good. They lack a lot of energy and a bit dry, but they to have decent clarity. The highs like the rest of the M Series have a good deal of sparkle and extension. Again though, the prominence of the highs is largely depend on the tips used. Basically, the deeper the insertion the more bass oriented the M9 will be. Using the double-flange has the opposite effect bring better balance and more treble. Where the M9 excels is airiness. The M9 is the best budget IEM I have heard in this regard. This is the one place the M9 beats the M6.

With the recent sale prices of the M9, it is one of the best sub-$20 IEM's on the market. It's biggest competition is probably the M6 which has fallen in price to the point it is only a few dollars more--the M9 is a few dollars more than the M2 and M6 is a few dollars more than the M9, are you noticing a trend here? Well where the M9 differs from the M2 is I sound not necessarily recommend the M9 over the M6. M6 is better in sound quality, but it is not a big enough improvement in my opinion to justify getting it if you dislike the over ear design.

M6

Accessories-wise, the M6 differs only from the M9 in tips. The M6 includes a bunch, small, medium, and large single-flanges, double-flanges, and small and large triple-flanges.

Build quality of the M6 is just slightly lower than that of the M9 due to the plastic housings. Despite being plastic though the M6 is very sturdy and should withstand normal abuse. The cable is the same as the rest of the M Series and same as the M9 in length. Strain reliefs are the same as the M9 except position to be worn over the ear. The M6 has a right-angle plug, while the M6P has a 45-degree plug.

Comfort is debatable. Some people prefer wearing IEM's over the ear while other cannot stand it. If you are the latter just get the M9. If you are the former get the M6. It is as simple as that. The M6 unique design lets in sit flat on your ear much like a earbud. This along with the memory wire make it a good choice for a IEM to sleep in. The memory wire also keeps it in place while running. The down side is that the memory wire can be difficult to get fit right. (It can be removed fairly easily though as IDvsEGO has shown and I can confirm having attempted it myself.)

Isolation varies greatly depending on tip. With triple and double-flange the M6 is decent. But I generally use the smallest tips for comfort and isolation is mediocre at best.

Sound quality is better than the M9. Not leaps and bounds better, but it is better. The M6 is better balanced than the M9 with the bass being a little lighter and not creeping up on the mids has bad. There is still a lot of bass though. However the bass is not as hard hitting as the M9 and lacks the low-end extension of the M9. The mids are recessed, but not nearly as bad as the M9. The biggest problem with the mids is vocals sound hollow. But like the M9 they are they are actually pretty good if you can get past that. The highs are bright and sparkly. Where the M9 may a little more bass the M6 has a little more treble. Sound stage is average and fails to compare with the impressive airiness of the M9. Detail and clarity is where the M6 bests the M9.

So is it is worth the extra money to get the M6? I say it comes down to design first. Do you want over the ear or straight down? If that is not important to you then the choice is between airiness of the M9 and the detail of the M6. Lastly, it comes down to the low-end extension of the M9 and the balance of the M6. Take those three things along with price into consideration and make a choice.

M11+

Accessories are the same for the M11+ as the M9 and M6, but the amount tips included is crazy! Small, medium, large, extra-large single-flange, medium and large extra-long single-flange, standard double-flange, and small, medium, and large double-flange. In case you lost count that is 11 sets of tips! I do believe that is the most tips I have ever see with any IEM.

Build quality is above the M6 and equal to the M9. Housing are metal and strong. If they have a weak point it is that the ring on the back where the strain relief is can become loose. Nothing a little glue cannot solve though. The cable is the same as the one found on the M6 and M9. Strain reliefs are hard rubber and work well. Both the M11+ and M11P+ terminate in a 45-degree plug.

Comfort is where the M11+ excels. The M11+ is the smallest IEM I have ever seen. I have swallowed pills bigger than the M11+. Needless to say it's size makes it super comfortable. It disappears even into my small ear canals--this might actually prove a problem for someone with large ears. If you have small ears though I cannot recommend the M11+ enough. And there light weight makes it very easy to forget you are wearing them.

Isolation is decent due the small size of the M11+ allowing a deep insertion. However, I could see how the small size of the M11+ might have the opposite effect for someone with large ears.

Sound quality is very close to the M6. The M11+ probably has the most bass of the original M Series. To me though, it lacks the impact of the M9. The mids are where the M11+ differ greatly from the M6 and M9 moving away from the recessed midrange. The mids are not forward, but they are no longer recessed either. The treble is less harsh than the M6, but remains very bright and sparkly. Detail and clarity are similar to the M6 as is the sound stage.

All in all, the sound signature of the M11+ reminds me of the M6 without many of its flaws like the recessed mids and sibilant treble plus a little boost in the bass. But with the M11+ costing twice as much as the M6, it is hard to justify for me. If you are looking a super comfortable IEM then it might be worth it. But otherwise I would probably save my money and get the M6.

Conclusion

Back to the question, M9 or M6? With the street price of both being roughly the same these days, I would say the choice should be based on comfort first. Over ear or straight down? Next I would say sound signature. If you prefer airiness and low-end extension the M9 is for you. If you prefer balance and detail the M6 is the way to go.

Regarding the M2 and M11+, both are over shadowed by the great prices of the M9 and M6. The M2 might be good choice if you are looking for the absolute cheapest headset for your phone or you cannot stand recessed mids, other wise spend a few bucks more and get the M9. The M11+ is one of the most comfortable IEM's I own and does fix some of the flaws of the M6, but the higher price makes it a tougher choice with the M6 being almost as good at half the price--not to mention there are many other good choices from MEElectonics and other brands in the M11+ price range.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P

Last edited by cnhardwick; 04-23-2011 at 11:36 PM.
Reply With Quote

Advertisement [Remove Advertisement]

  #2  
Old 04-23-2011, 06:43 PM
JxK's Avatar
JxK JxK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 439
Default

Thanks for the thorough impressions. Just one word on price. Nowadays the M6 can be found on amazon for $20, the M9 for $17. Thus the difference in price between the two is a non-issue. And for $20 I can't think of a better IEM than the M6.
__________________
Home: Laptop > TBAAM > Audio Technica M50, Grado SR-60
Portable: Sansa Clip (rockbox) > Phonak Audéo PFE,
Meelectronics M6, Koss ksc75
Pulvis et umbra sumus.
-Horace
Reply With Quote

  #3  
Old 04-23-2011, 07:04 PM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JxK View Post
Thanks for the thorough impressions. Just one word on price. Nowadays the M6 can be found on amazon for $20, the M9 for $17. Thus the difference in price between the two is a non-issue. And for $20 I can't think of a better IEM than the M6.
Thanks. I kind of tried to imply that throughout the review without giving any hard numbers since the prices change. I may not have succeeded though. For the record though, the lowest I have seen the M6P is $13 shipped. The lowest I have seen the M9P shipped was $8. None mic'd versions tend to be a little higher: M6: $15 shipped and M9 $10 shipped. But since these are often one-day deals with limited quantities I did not want to mention them in the review. That, and ABi has a lot of non-US members who cannot order from Amazon (US) and Newegg, so I decided MSRP and hinting at lower street prices was the best way to go. I might be wrong though.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P

Last edited by cnhardwick; 04-23-2011 at 11:44 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #4  
Old 05-24-2011, 08:37 AM
ammar ammar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 63
Default

Just bought the m9s yesterday. Not a good first impression, but they're in the process of burning in so we'll so how they go...
Reply With Quote

  #5  
Old 05-24-2011, 06:17 PM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ammar View Post
Just bought the m9s yesterday. Not a good first impression, but they're in the process of burning in so we'll so how they go...
What are you coming from? The M9 is the hardest to get use to for me. The mids are just so recessed. You just have to wait for the mental burn in to take effect till the mids start sounding natural.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #6  
Old 05-24-2011, 07:14 PM
WalkGood's Avatar
WalkGood WalkGood is offline
Ultra Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 12,579
Default

I could not live with that sound signature; I'd return or sell them and move on. MEE does sell some earphones that sound good across the sound spectrum, wouldn't hurt to ask for any upgrade. That sound description reminds me of the M16s V-shaped sound sig, not my cup of tea but I guess ok for inexpensive entry level IEMs...
__________________
WalkGood,
Ramón

abi >> | Forum Rules | Glossary | Why Rockbox | FLAC or MP3? | irc
Reply With Quote

  #7  
Old 05-25-2011, 06:12 AM
ammar ammar is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnhardwick View Post
What are you coming from? The M9 is the hardest to get use to for me. The mids are just so recessed. You just have to wait for the mental burn in to take effect till the mids start sounding natural.
Nothing fancy at all, im no audiophile or anything. I was using sennheiser cx-300s, those broke so then i just used the Zune IEMS! and Sennheiser HD 201 for when Im at home.

Nice reviews though, shame I took other reviews into account who all said i was great headphone for the price etc! Should've listened to you and not these other reviewers haha. Not terrible or anything by any means, and they're still burning in but i'm feeling I shoulda stuck with the trust cx's.
Reply With Quote

  #8  
Old 05-25-2011, 09:25 AM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ammar View Post
Nothing fancy at all, im no audiophile or anything. I was using sennheiser cx-300s, those broke so then i just used the Zune IEMS! and Sennheiser HD 201 for when Im at home.

Nice reviews though, shame I took other reviews into account who all said i was great headphone for the price etc! Should've listened to you and not these other reviewers haha. Not terrible or anything by any means, and they're still burning in but i'm feeling I shoulda stuck with the trust cx's.
They really are good earphones for the prices they go for these days. I would say they are better, be it ever so slightly than the CX300 and Zune Premium. The bass is less muddy than the CX300 and the sound stage is less flat than the Zunes. However, the V-shaped sound signature sort of counter balances all that. If you like the warmth of the CX300 and the balance of the Zunes you might want to consider the MEElectronics CW31. The sound quality should be a big step up from the CX300, Zunes, and M9. I posted my review of it in the review section.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #9  
Old 02-02-2012, 10:56 AM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

I picked up a pair of M6P in a recent sale and noticed a few design changes worth mentioning. One is a switch from the 45 degree jack to a 90 degree jack. The other is the redesign of the remote/mic piece. It not includes a dedicated button (apposed to the whole piece being one big button before) and strain reliefs on the either end of the remote/mic. It remains to be seen how well these improvement actually preform, but they do seem to be attempts at fixing a few of the problems I had with the "P" models from MEElectronics. On the downside, the driver flex is annoying. Strangely, both clear M6 I have had have had no driver flex while all three black M6P I have had driver flex. IDK not know if the color has any affect or if it was just purely luck.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #10  
Old 02-02-2012, 07:06 PM
Lagoo56's Avatar
Lagoo56 Lagoo56 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SI,NY
Posts: 737
Default

I have a pair of M9's and they are just okay,not anything special to my ears. I don't like them much and getting ready to return them. The Xeport series of IEM's are in the same price range and offer much better value and gave me a much better impression. But by your description,I probably would of liked the M6's more than the M9's.
__________________
DAPs I own: Rockboxed Sansa C250 2GB+64GB MicroSDXC
Tablets I own:Rooted 8GB Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 7.0 running Sungsonic 2 HD JB 4.1.2
Rooted 80GB Asus Memopad HD 7
Reply With Quote

  #11  
Old 02-03-2012, 12:29 AM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

IMO, the problem with the M9 is not its sound quality, but its sound signature. For a $10 IEM the sound quality is pretty decent. But the deep V-shaped sound signature just gets kind of annoying. The bass overshadows the mids. The mids while detailed sound very distant. And the treble can get overbearing and harsh if you turn the volume up--which you want to do because the mids are not loud enough. I do believe using double flanges help balance the sound out, but that is not an option for my small ears. In the end, the M9 is not a bad IEM, it has better sound quality than your average $10 IEM at Walmart. But its weird sound signature makes it rather unfriendly. These days with so many good inexpensive IEMs on the market there is no need to settle for that anymore.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #12  
Old 02-03-2012, 01:19 PM
JK98 JK98 is offline
Ultra Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,057
Default

I guess that is the reason to step up to the M21 or CW31. While these aren't as cheap as the M9, they are still under $30. The M9 is at least $14.99 in the US with shipping. Where did you see a $10 price that includes shipping?
Reply With Quote

  #13  
Old 02-03-2012, 01:35 PM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JK98 View Post
I guess that is the reason to step up to the M21 or CW31. While these aren't as cheap as the M9, they are still under $30. The M9 is at least $14.99 in the US with shipping. Where did you see a $10 price that includes shipping?
Newegg runs them (and/or the M9P) on sale on for $9.99 with FS about every other week. (Made front page on Slickdeals.net last week.) Amazon usually price matches when they do. Newegg also tends to run the M6P on sale for $11-13 which is worth the extra dollar or two IMO.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #14  
Old 03-11-2012, 01:08 AM
Pratham Pratham is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9
Smile

soundmagic e10 or the m11+ ?
also,many people have rated
tekfusion -twinwoofers highly.
in comparision,how are they ?
thnks.

Last edited by Pratham; 03-11-2012 at 01:13 AM.
Reply With Quote

  #15  
Old 03-11-2012, 05:23 PM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

I have not heard the E10 so I cannot compare them for you. However, seeing has how ABi gave E10 the editor's choice and they are cheaper than the M11+ I would probably go for them. At the current $40+ price for the M11+ I would have a hard recommending it.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old 03-11-2012, 07:55 PM
Pratham Pratham is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9
Default

i live in india..and the price difference b/w the two is not much..in fact the m11+ is a bit cheaperon flipkart.com.
Reply With Quote

  #17  
Old 03-12-2012, 10:41 AM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Looking at the prices on flipart.com, I would not get the M11+ when the M21 (newer model) is cheaper. Without having heard the E10, I would bet it sounds the best sounding of the three.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #18  
Old 03-12-2012, 06:48 PM
Pratham Pratham is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9
Default

so the m21 is better than the m11+ ?
Reply With Quote

  #19  
Old 03-13-2012, 09:12 AM
cnhardwick cnhardwick is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pratham View Post
so the m21 is better than the m11+ ?
It is not better, but it is not worse either. The difference is the sound signature. The M11+ is bass and treble heavy while the M21 is more bass and mid centered. Which is better would depend on your personal preference--and the price.
__________________
Players: 4 GB Sansa Clip | 32 GB iPod touch (4th generation)
Headphones: Audio-Technica ATH-M50 IEM: MEElectronics A151, M6 and M9P
Reply With Quote

  #20  
Old 03-13-2012, 01:18 PM
Pratham Pratham is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 9
Default

um..
i mainly listen to alternative and punk rock,anime osts and the occasional hip hop.
so could u please tell what would be good ?
Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 AM.