|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
And stop wondering about nothing and click the link above. You can listen to all sorts of pitch errors and see for yourself what you can hear.
__________________
Interested in Google's Summer of Code ? PM me. |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Placebo effect | The Audio Critic | Sound Expert | ABX programs | Confirmation bias |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Interested in Google's Summer of Code ? PM me. |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
So I came across this http://nwavguy.blogspot.com/2011/02/...-measured.html
and there is this one quote in it "PITCH TEST (revised 5/25): It's somewhat unusual to find significant pitch errors in today's digital audio players. And, if the error is consistent sample-to-sample, it's likely a design error with the hardware or firmware. There's already some info on the web about the Clip+ "running fast" and mine indeed does but only by a very small amount: 0.25%. So the musical note Middle C is 441 hz instead of 440 hz. I wonder how many would notice this, but I did confirm the problem using my Agilent bench meter (which has an extremely accurate internal timebase) and playing back a "perfect" 1 Khz sine wave: ROCKBOX PITCH FIX: The good folks who maintain Rockbox apparently knew about the above error, and interestingly, fixed it in their firmware. Here's the same Clip+ playing the same file but running Rockbox and the error is now near zero (0.04%):" 0.25% worried me but 0.04% doesn't. Especially considering the awesome frequency response and absence of nasty rolloff.
|
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.












Linear Mode
